| This page is a test version of a potential new layout for the Perennial sources project. It is a demo and not part of the live listings. See Talk. |
| This source in a nutshell: There is |
| Type | website |
|---|---|
| Shortcut | WP:ALLSIDES |
| Status | |
| Deprecated | no |
| Blacklisted | no |
| Recency | 2023 |
| Domain allsides.com | |
| In source code Spamcheck tool | |
| RfC | |
| Link | Rfc |
| Date | 2022 |
AllSides is an American company that estimates the bias of sources. In the 2022 RfC, editors found that reliability varies among its articles and should be determined on a case-by-case basis. A slight consensus believes that while the high-confidence ratings are generally reliable as they are reviewed carefully by experts, others depend on blind user surveys they consider opinionated and less reliable, though the inclusion of even reliable statements should be evaluated with WP:Due weight. A significant amount of users disagreed and argued that AllSides's methodology, which is partly based on the opinions of users, makes it unsuitable for Wikipedia. A significant minority of users noted that AllSides has been referenced in reliable sources as an accurate source for media bias ratings.
{{Infobox company | name = AllSides Technologies Inc. | logo = AllSides logo.svg | logo_size = 250px | logo_alt = A cube composed of speech balloons, with one red, one purple, and one blue shown, and the unspaced wordmark "AllSides" | logo_caption = | key_people =
2023
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| AllSides WP:ALLSIDES 📌 |
2023 |
AllSides is an American company that estimates the bias of sources. In the 2022 RfC, editors found that reliability varies among its articles and should be determined on a case-by-case basis. A slight consensus believes that while the high-confidence ratings are generally reliable as they are reviewed carefully by experts, others depend on blind user surveys they consider opinionated and less reliable, though the inclusion of even reliable statements should be evaluated with WP:Due weight. A significant amount of users disagreed and argued that AllSides's methodology, which is partly based on the opinions of users, makes it unsuitable for Wikipedia. A significant minority of users noted that AllSides has been referenced in reliable sources as an accurate source for media bias ratings. | 1Â | ||