Army Recognition

Army Recognition
Type	website
Shortcut	WP:ARMYRECOGNITION
Status	Generally unreliable
Deprecated	no
Blacklisted	no
Recency	2025
Domain armyrecognition.com
	In source code; External links in articles; Spamcheck tool

This page is a test version of a potential new layout for the Perennial sources project. It is a demo and not part of the live listings. See Talk.

This source in a nutshell: Army Recognition is considered

generally unreliable. See § Summary.

Army Recognition is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. This page collects and links information about previous discussions and current consensus, and summarizes it here for convenience.

Summary

Army Recognition is a site that reproduces press release material without any original reportage. In at least one example it has copied content without attribution from other sources. Editors allege that Army Recognition operates on a pay-for-coverage basis, providing "online marketing and advertising solutions" for the defense industry. This model may raise questions about the impartiality and independence of its content.

Excerpt

Page 'Army Recognition' not found

Discussions

Links

RSN

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344#armyrecognition.com

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 349#Army Recognition

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 488#Request to revise Army Recognition entry – defamatory & unsourced

Recency

2025

Rfcs

No Rfcs for this source.

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources
Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
Source	Status (legend)	List	Last	Summary	Use
Army Recognition WP:ARMYRECOGNITIONWP:ARMYRECOGNITION 📌		1 2 3	2025	Army Recognition is a site that reproduces press release material without any original reportage. In at least one example it has copied content without attribution from other sources. Editors allege that Army Recognition operates on a pay-for-coverage basis, providing "online marketing and advertising solutions" for the defense industry. This model may raise questions about the impartiality and independence of its content.	1 2