| This page is a test version of a potential new layout for the Perennial sources project. It is a demo and not part of the live listings. See Talk. |
| This source in a nutshell: Climate Feedback is considered |
| Type | website |
|---|---|
| Shortcut | WP:CLIMATEFEEDBACK |
| Status | |
| Deprecated | no |
| Blacklisted | no |
| Recency | 2020 |
| Domain climatefeedback.org | |
| In source code Spamcheck tool | |
Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the International Fact-Checking Network, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a self-published source due to its high reviewer requirements.
Climate Feedback (CF) is a web-based content annotation tool that allows qualified scientists to comment on stories online, adding context and noting inaccuracies. It is one of three websites under the Science Feedback parent organization that fact-checks media coverage. Science Feedback is a non-profit organization registered in France.
No Rfcs for this source.
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| Climate Feedback WP:CLIMATEFEEDBACK 📌 |
1 2 3 4 | 2020 |
Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the International Fact-Checking Network, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a self-published source due to its high reviewer requirements. | 1Â | |