CounterPunch

CounterPunch
Typewebsite
ShortcutWP:COUNTERPUNCH
StatusGenerally unreliable Generally unreliable
Deprecatedno
Blacklistedno
Recency2022
Domain counterpunch.org
In source code

External links in articles

Spamcheck tool
RfC
LinkRfc
Date2021


Summary

CounterPunch is a left-wing political opinion magazine. Despite the fact that the publication has an editorial board, there is no effective editorial control over the content of the publication, so articles should be treated as self-published sources. As a consequence, the articles should generally be avoided and should not be used to establish notability unless published by subject-matter experts writing about subjects within their domain of expertise, in which case they may be considered reliable for facts. Citing CounterPunch for third-party claims about living persons is not allowed. All articles on CounterPunch must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, in particular for due weight, and opinions must be attributed. Some articles in the publication promote conspiracy theories and historical denialism, but there was no consensus to deprecate the outlet based on the most recent RfC.

Excerpt

CounterPunch is a left-wing online magazine. Content includes a free section published five days a week as well as a subscriber-only area called CounterPunch+, where original articles are published weekly. CounterPunch is based in the United States and covers politics in a manner its editors describe as "muckraking with a radical attitude".

Discussions


Recency

2022

Rfcs

  1. 2021 Rfc
  1. 2022 Rfc

Notes

References

    Original table row for comparison

    (remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

    Perennial sources
    Source Status
    (legend)    		 Discussions Use
    List Last Summary
    CounterPunch
    WP:COUNTERPUNCHWP:COUNTERPUNCH 📌    		 Generally unreliable Request for comment 2021 Request for comment 2022 Stale discussions

    2022

    		 CounterPunch is a left-wing political opinion magazine. Despite the fact that the publication has an editorial board, there is no effective editorial control over the content of the publication, so articles should be treated as self-published sources. As a consequence, the articles should generally be avoided and should not be used to establish notability unless published by subject-matter experts writing about subjects within their domain of expertise, in which case they may be considered reliable for facts. Citing CounterPunch for third-party claims about living persons is not allowed. All articles on CounterPunch must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, in particular for due weight, and opinions must be attributed. Some articles in the publication promote conspiracy theories and historical denialism, but there was no consensus to deprecate the outlet based on the most recent RfC. 1 Links Spamcheck
    2 Links Spamcheck