Townhall

Townhall
Type	website
Status	No consensus
Deprecated	no
Blacklisted	no
Recency	2018
Domain townhall.com
	In source code; External links in articles; Spamcheck tool

This page is a test version of a potential new layout for the Perennial sources project. It is a demo and not part of the live listings. See Talk.

This source in a nutshell: There is

no consensus on the reliability of Townhall. See § Summary.

Townhall is a source that has been repeatedly discussed at the Reliable sources noticeboard. This page collects and links information about previous discussions and current consensus, and summarizes it here for convenience.

Summary

As of 2010, a few editors commented that opinion pieces in Townhall are reliable as a source for the opinion of the author of the individual piece, although they may not be reliable for unattributed statements of fact, and context will dictate whether the opinion of the author as such, meets the standard of WP:DUEWEIGHT.

Excerpt

Discussions

Links

RSN

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 23#http://townhall.com/

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 69#Is Townhall.com a reliable source for proving opposing opinions?

WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248#Why Townhall is not a RS

Recency

2018

Rfcs

No Rfcs for this source.

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources
Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
Source	Status (legend)	List	Last	Summary	Use
Townhall		1 2 3	2018	As of 2010, a few editors commented that opinion pieces in Townhall are reliable as a source for the opinion of the author of the individual piece, although they may not be reliable for unattributed statements of fact, and context will dictate whether the opinion of the author as such, meets the standard of WP:DUEWEIGHT.	1