Wikidata

This source has separate reliability assessments by time period or topic; each is presented in its own section below.

general

Wikidata (general)
typewebsite
shortcutWP:RSPWD
statusGenerally unreliable generally unreliable
blacklistedno
recency2024
Domain wikidata.org
In source code

External links in articles

Spamcheck tool

Summary

Wikidata is largely user-generated, and articles should not directly cite Wikidata as a source (just as it would be inappropriate to cite other Wikipedias' articles as sources). See also: Wikidata transcluded statements.

Discussions

RSN

Recency

2024

RfCs

No RfCs for this assessment.

transcluded statements

Wikidata (transcluded statements)
typewebsite
shortcutWP:RSPWDTRANS
statusNo consensus no consensus
blacklistedno
recency2018

Summary

Uniquely among WMF sites, Wikidata's statements can be directly transcluded into articles; this is usually done to provide external links or infobox data. For example, more than two million external links from Wikidata are shown through the {{Authority control}} template. There has been controversy over the use of Wikidata in the English Wikipedia due to its infancy, its vandalism issues and its sourcing. While there is no consensus on whether information from Wikidata should be used at all, there is general agreement that any Wikidata statements transcluded need to be just as – or more – reliable compared to Wikipedia content. As such, Module:WikidataIB and some related modules and templates filter unsourced Wikidata statements by default; however, other modules and templates, such as Module:Wikidata, do not. See also: Wikidata (direct citations).

Discussions

RSN

Recency

Stale discussions 2018

RfCs

No RfCs for this assessment.

Excerpt

Wikidata is a collaboratively edited multilingual knowledge graph hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. It is a source of open data released under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication. It is for the use of both Wikimedia and external projects. Wikidata is a wiki powered by the software MediaWiki, including its extension for semi-structured data, the Wikibase. As of early 2025, Wikidata had 1.65 billion item statements (semantic triples).

Notes

References

    Original table rows for comparison

    (remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

    Perennial sources
    Source Status
    (legend)
    Discussions Use
    List Last Summary
    Wikidata
    WP:RSPWD 📌
    Generally unreliable Request for comment 2013 Request for comment 2018

    2024

    Wikidata is largely user-generated, and articles should not directly cite Wikidata as a source (just as it would be inappropriate to cite other Wikipedias' articles as sources). See also: Wikidata transcluded statements. 1 Links Spamcheck
    Wikidata transcluded statements
    WP:RSPWDTRANS 📌
    No consensus Request for comment 2013 Request for comment 2018 Stale discussions

    2018

    Uniquely among WMF sites, Wikidata's statements can be directly transcluded into articles; this is usually done to provide external links or infobox data. For example, more than two million external links from Wikidata are shown through the {{Authority control}} template. There has been controversy over the use of Wikidata in the English Wikipedia due to its infancy, its vandalism issues and its sourcing. While there is no consensus on whether information from Wikidata should be used at all, there is general agreement that any Wikidata statements transcluded need to be just as – or more – reliable compared to Wikipedia content. As such, Module:WikidataIB and some related modules and templates filter unsourced Wikidata statements by default; however, other modules and templates, such as Module:Wikidata, do not. See also: Wikidata (direct citations).