Antiwar.com

Antiwar.com

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases.

There is consensus that Antiwar.com is generally unreliable. Editors consider Antiwar.com to be biased or opinionated.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Antiwar.com and Globalsecurity.org
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#antiwar.com
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 71#The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 106#antiwar.com

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Antiwar.com		1 2 3 4	2011	There is consensus that Antiwar.com is generally unreliable. Editors consider Antiwar.com to be biased or opinionated.	1   2