Ars Technica

Ars Technica

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

Ars Technica is considered generally reliable for science- and technology-related articles.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Ars Technica news?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136#Ars Technica a Reliable Source?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371# RS for Board Games- Board Game Quest, Ars Technica, Kotaku and TechRaptor

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Ars Technica WP:ARSTECHNICAWP:ARSTECHNICA 📌		1 2 3	2022	Ars Technica is considered generally reliable for science- and technology-related articles.	1   2