| source type | foobar (not part of original row) |
|---|---|
| publisher | Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row) |
| classification | |
There is a consensus that Ballotpedia is generally reliable. It has a professional editorial staff, corrections policy, and significant WP:USEBYOTHERS.
Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| Ballotpedia WP:BALLOTPEDIA 📌 |
1 2 |
2026 |
There is a consensus that Ballotpedia is generally reliable. It has a professional editorial staff, corrections policy, and significant WP:USEBYOTHERS. | 1Â | |