Business Insider (AI content)

Business Insider

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases.

Consistent with several recent decisions our community has made about LLM-generated writing, consensus here is that Wikipedians don't trust it at all. Business Insider claims that humans will review the LLM-generated content, but Wikipedians are remarkably cynical about this. Consensus is that anything published with a disclosure about "Business Insider AI" is (a) generally unreliable and (b) not an indicator of notability at AFD.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Business Insider (AI content)		2025	2024	Consistent with several recent decisions our community has made about LLM-generated writing, consensus here is that Wikipedians don't trust it at all. Business Insider claims that humans will review the LLM-generated content, but Wikipedians are remarkably cynical about this. Consensus is that anything published with a disclosure about "Business Insider AI" is (a) generally unreliable and (b) not an indicator of notability at AFD.