CESNUR

CESNUR

(not part of original row)
other names	Centro Studi sulle Nuove Religioni, Center for Studies on New Religions, Bitter Winter
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases.

CESNUR is an apologia site for new religious movements, and thus is inherently unreliable in its core area due to conflicts of interest. There is also consensus that its content is unreliable on its own merits. CESNUR has an online magazine, Bitter Winter, that is also considered generally unreliable.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#CESNUR / Its proponents
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#CESNUR as a source for articles on New religious movements
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#Massimo Introvigne and CESNUR
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 504#Revisiting CESNUR as reliable source

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
CESNUR (Centro Studi sulle Nuove Religioni, Center for Studies on New Religions, Bitter Winter) WP:CESNURWP:CESNUR 📌		2022	2026	CESNUR is an apologia site for new religious movements, and thus is inherently unreliable in its core area due to conflicts of interest. There is also consensus that its content is unreliable on its own merits. CESNUR has an online magazine, Bitter Winter, that is also considered generally unreliable.	1   2   3