Climate Feedback

Climate Feedback

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the International Fact-Checking Network, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a self-published source due to its high reviewer requirements.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 250#Are we allowed to cite climate scientists?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 252#Climatefeedback.org (a climate science fact-checking website)
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274#Factcheck from climatefeedback.org as a source at Guus Berkhout
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 284#Climate Feedback and similar blog sources being treated differently?

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Climate Feedback WP:CLIMATEFEEDBACKWP:CLIMATEFEEDBACK 📌		1 2 3 4	2020	Climate Feedback is a fact-checking website that is considered generally reliable for topics related to climate change. It discloses its methodologies, is certified by the International Fact-Checking Network, and has been endorsed by other reliable sources. Most editors do not consider Climate Feedback a self-published source due to its high reviewer requirements.	1