Cracked.com

Cracked.com

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases.

Cracked.com is a humor website. There is consensus that Cracked.com is generally unreliable. When Cracked.com cites another source for an article, it is preferable for editors to read and cite that source instead.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 36#Cracked.com
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 95#Cracked.com Children's toys/characters and profane reviews
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 147#Cracked.com
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 195#Cracked
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 196#Cracked.com on Fifty Shades of Grey

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Cracked.com WP:CRACKEDWP:CRACKED 📌		1 2 3 4 5	2015	Cracked.com is a humor website. There is consensus that Cracked.com is generally unreliable. When Cracked.com cites another source for an article, it is preferable for editors to read and cite that source instead.	1