Debrett's

Debrett's
logo (not part of original row)
source typefoobar (not part of original row)
publisherFooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification Usually reliable for typical purposes

There is consensus that Debrett's is reliable for genealogical information. However, their defunct "People of Today" section is considered to be not adequately independent as the details were solicited from the subjects. Editors have also raised concerns that this section included paid coverage.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

Notes

References

    Original table row for comparison

    (remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

    Perennial sources
    Source Status
    (legend)
    Discussions Use
    List Last Summary
    Debrett's
    WP:DEBRETTSWP:DEBRETTS 📌
    Generally reliable Request for comment 2020 Stale discussions

    2020

    There is consensus that Debrett's is reliable for genealogical information. However, their defunct "People of Today" section is considered to be not adequately independent as the details were solicited from the subjects. Editors have also raised concerns that this section included paid coverage. 1 Links Spamcheck