Destructoid

Destructoid

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is a consensus that Destructoid is marginally reliable for topics on video games. As a site featuring articles written mainly by freelance journalists, consider whether the author is trusted before using Destructoid as a source in articles. Destructoid may still be used for video game reviews given that attribution is provided.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 36#Destructoid
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 2#Destructoid.com
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 6#Destructoid editorial review process?
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 116#Situational Sources
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Destructoid staff/community post separation
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Destructoid WP:DESTRUCTOIDWP:DESTRUCTOID 📌		A B C D E	2017	There is a consensus that Destructoid is marginally reliable for topics on video games. As a site featuring articles written mainly by freelance journalists, consider whether the author is trusted before using Destructoid as a source in articles. Destructoid may still be used for video game reviews given that attribution is provided.	1