Evening Standard

Evening Standard

(not part of original row)
other names	London Evening Standard
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is no consensus on the reliability of the Evening Standard. Despite being a free newspaper, it is generally considered more reliable than most British tabloids and middle-market newspapers.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 26#The Sun/Matt Smith
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 85#Unite Against Fascism and The Times et al
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 102#The London Evening Standard
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#The Daily Mail?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242#Should The Evening Standard be considered an unreliable source?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 254#Discussion (The Sun)

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Evening Standard (London Evening Standard) WP:THESTANDARDWP:THESTANDARD 📌 WP:STANDARDUKWP:STANDARDUK 📌		1 2 3 4 5 6	2018	There is no consensus on the reliability of the Evening Standard. Despite being a free newspaper, it is generally considered more reliable than most British tabloids and middle-market newspapers.	1