Financial Times

Financial Times

(not part of original row)
other names	FT
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

The Financial Times is considered generally reliable.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 29#Sakhalin-II
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 45#Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the Daily Telegraph
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 67#G. Edward Griffin's "The Creature from Jekyll Island" book
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74#Central bank
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 94#Carola Hoyos / Financial Times on history of slavery
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#Using the term "chess prodigy"

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Financial Times (FT) WP:FINANCIALTIMESWP:FINANCIALTIMES 📌		1 2 3 4 5 6	2018	The Financial Times is considered generally reliable.	1