| other names | History Channel, History.com |
|---|---|
| source type | foobar (not part of original row) |
| publisher | Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row) |
| classification | |
Most editors consider History Channel generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for accuracy and its tendency to broadcast programs that promote conspiracy theories.
Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| History (History Channel, History.com) WP:RSPHISTORY 📌 |
1 2 3 | 2021 |
Most editors consider History Channel generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for accuracy and its tendency to broadcast programs that promote conspiracy theories. | 1Â | |