Independent Journal Review

Shortcut
Independent Journal Review
logo (not part of original row)
other namesIJR
source typefoobar (not part of original row)
publisherFooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classificationNo consensus No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is no consensus on the reliability of the Independent Journal Review. Posts from "community" members are considered self-published sources. The site's "news" section consists mostly of syndicated stories from Reuters, and citations of these stories should preferably point to Reuters.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

Notes

References

    Original table row for comparison

    (remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

    Perennial sources
    Source Status
    (legend)    		 Discussions Use
    List Last Summary
    Independent Journal Review (IJR)
    WP:IJRWP:IJR 📌    		 No consensus 1 2 3 Stale discussions

    2018

    		 There is no consensus on the reliability of the Independent Journal Review. Posts from "community" members are considered self-published sources. The site's "news" section consists mostly of syndicated stories from Reuters, and citations of these stories should preferably point to Reuters. 1 Links Spamcheck