Jezebel (website)

Jezebel (website)

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is no consensus on the reliability of Jezebel. Most editors believe that Jezebel is biased or opinionated, and that its claims should be attributed. Jezebel should generally not be used for contentious claims, especially ones about living persons. The website shut down in November 2023 but was relaunched in December 2023.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 149#FetLife
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 209#Is Jezebel.com (online news magazine) an RS?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 401#Do the actions of a Jezebel writer reflect on the source?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 409#G/O Media to start using AI

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Jezebel WP:JEZEBELWP:JEZEBEL 📌		1 2 3 4	2023	There is no consensus on the reliability of Jezebel. Most editors believe that Jezebel is biased or opinionated, and that its claims should be attributed. Jezebel should generally not be used for contentious claims, especially ones about living persons. The website shut down in November 2023 but was relaunched in December 2023.	1