Kotaku (2023–present)

Shortcut
Kotaku
logo (not part of original row)
source typefoobar (not part of original row)
publisherFooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classificationGenerally unreliable Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases.

Kotaku articles written from 2023 onwards are generally unreliable as the site has used content farms and AI-generated content in a non-transparent manner. In March 2025, Kotaku Australia's domain was usurped by the unaffiliated Kotaku Times, an AI-generated content mill.[1] See also: Kotaku (pre-2023).

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.


Notes

References

  1. ↑ Plunkett, Luke (March 17, 2025). "Kotaku.com.au Would Have Been Better Off Dead". Aftermath. Retrieved January 20, 2026.

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources
Source Status
(legend)		 Discussions Use
List Last Summary
Kotaku (2023–present)
WP:KOTAKUWP:KOTAKU 📌		 Generally unreliable A B

2023

 Kotaku articles written from 2023 onwards are generally unreliable as the site has used content farms and AI-generated content in a non-transparent manner. In March 2025, Kotaku Australia's domain was usurped by the unaffiliated Kotaku Times, an AI-generated content mill.[1] See also: Kotaku (pre-2023). 1 Links Spamcheck
2 Links Spamcheck
3 Links Spamcheck
  1. ↑ Plunkett, Luke (March 17, 2025). "Kotaku.com.au Would Have Been Better Off Dead". Aftermath. Retrieved January 20, 2026.