MEMRI

MEMRI

(not part of original row)
other names	MEMRI
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

The reliability of MEMRI is considered to lie between no consensus and generally unreliable. Many editors argue that MEMRI has a history of providing misleading coverage and that the source should be used with caution if at all.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 8#MEMRI
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 16#MEMRI, again
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 32#Memri
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 422#Is Kyiv Post or MEMRI right?

• Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Archive 9#MEMRI
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) WP:MEMRIWP:MEMRI 📌		2020	2023	The reliability of MEMRI is considered to lie between no consensus and generally unreliable. Many editors argue that MEMRI has a history of providing misleading coverage and that the source should be used with caution if at all.	1   2