Mother Jones (magazine)

Mother Jones (magazine)

(not part of original row)
other names	MoJo
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

There is consensus that Mother Jones is generally reliable. Almost all editors consider Mother Jones a biased source, so its statements (particularly on political topics) may need to be attributed. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes due weight before citing it in an article.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 132#[Mother Jones and Rolling Stone articles as RS sources in a BLP for a contentious claim
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 149#Opinion column by Stephanie Mencimer in Mother Jones
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188#Buzzfeed, Mother Jones for BLP's.
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229#Is Mother Jones magazine a reliable source for investigative reporting?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274#Does this Mother Jones article accurately summarize the arguments made by the PragerU videos it cites?

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Mother Jones (MoJo) WP:MOTHERJONESWP:MOTHERJONES 📌		1 2 3 4 5	2019	There is consensus that Mother Jones is generally reliable. Almost all editors consider Mother Jones a biased source, so its statements (particularly on political topics) may need to be attributed. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes due weight before citing it in an article.	1