National Geographic

National Geographic

(not part of original row)
other names	The National Geographic Magazine, Nat Geo
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

There is consensus that National Geographic is generally reliable. For coverage by National Geographic of fringe topics and ideas, due weight and parity of sources should be considered.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126#National Geographic
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#National Geographic website, Krampus, and Hel
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313#National Geographic and Adam Weishaupt (the Illuminati guy)
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#National Geographic

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
National Geographic (The National Geographic Magazine, Nat Geo) WP:NATGEOWP:NATGEO 📌		1 2 3 4	2023	There is consensus that National Geographic is generally reliable. For coverage by National Geographic of fringe topics and ideas, due weight and parity of sources should be considered.	1