National Post

National Post

(not part of original row)
other names	Postmedia Network
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

National Post is considered to be a generally reliable newspaper.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 16#National Post
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 23#National Post Rejected as Reliable Source
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 28#National Post blog
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42#National Post Biography of Lawrence Solomon: SPS? or RS?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 269#National Post: Accusations of Plagriarism made in an opinion column
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 420#National Post reprint of Foundation for Defense of Democracies paper

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
National Post (Postmedia Network) WP:NATIONALPOSTWP:NATIONALPOST 📌		2024	2024	National Post is considered to be a generally reliable newspaper.	1