 (not part of original row) | |
| other names | NY Post, New York Evening Post, Page Six |
|---|---|
| source type | foobar (not part of original row) |
| publisher | Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row) |
| classification |  Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases. |
This consensus does not apply to the broadsheet publication of the same name that existed from 1801–1942.
Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| New York Post (NY Post, New York Evening Post, Page Six) (excluding entertainment) WP:NYPOST 📌 |
|
 2020 |
2025 |
There is consensus the New York Post is generally unreliable for factual reporting, especially with regard to politics, particularly New York City politics. A tabloid newspaper, editors criticise its lack of concern for fact-checking or corrections, including examples of outright fabrication. Editors consider the New York Post more reliable before it changed ownership in 1976, and particularly unreliable for coverage involving the New York City Police Department. A 2024 RfC concluded that the New York Post is marginally reliable for entertainment coverage; see below. | 1   2 |