Pinkvilla

Pinkvilla

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases.

Due to concerns centered around the reliability of box office numbers and lack of authenticity, in the 2025 RfC, there was consensus that Pinkvilla is generally unreliable.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 355#Pinkvilla, Meaww & Bollywood Life
• Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 418#Reliablity of Pinkvilla
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 463#Pinkvilla
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 466#pinkvilla.com - reliability disclaimers on pages
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 477#Pinkvilla copied data from Cinetrak
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 479#Pinkvilla
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 483#Pinkvilla

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force/Archive 8#Pinkvilla is unreliable for box office figures
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Pinkvilla WP:PINKVILLAWP:PINKVILLA 📌		2025	2025	Due to concerns centered around the reliability of box office numbers and lack of authenticity, in the 2025 RfC, there was consensus that Pinkvilla is generally unreliable.	1