Planespotters.net

Planespotters.net
logo (not part of original row)
source typefoobar (not part of original row)
publisherFooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classificationGenerally unreliable Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is questionable in most cases.

Although Planespotters.net has been widely used for aviation articles, there is consensus that it is generally unreliable. The website's content is mostly self-published or user-generated, unverified, with many instances of inaccurate reporting.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

Notes

References

    Original table row for comparison

    (remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

    Perennial sources
    Source Status
    (legend)
    Discussions Use
    List Last Summary
    Planespotters.net
    WP:PLANESPOTTERSWP:PLANESPOTTERS 📌
    Generally unreliable 1 2
    A B C

    2023

    Although Planespotters.net has been widely used for aviation articles, there is consensus that it is generally unreliable. The website's content is mostly self-published or user-generated, unverified, with many instances of inaccurate reporting. 1 Links Spamcheck