 (not part of original row) | |
| source type | foobar (not part of original row) |
|---|---|
| publisher | Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row) |
| classification |  Usually reliable for typical purposes |
There is consensus that staff content by Rappler is generally reliable. The IMHO section consists of opinions by readers, and not by paid staff. The defunct x.rappler.com section functioned as a self-published blogging service, and is therefore considered generally unreliable.
Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| Rappler WP:RAPPLER 📌 |
 |
1 2 3 | 
2018 |
There is consensus that staff content by Rappler is generally reliable. The IMHO section consists of opinions by readers, and not by paid staff. The defunct x.rappler.com section functioned as a self-published blogging service, and is therefore considered generally unreliable. | 1Â  Â  |