Science-Based Medicine

Science-Based Medicine

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

Science-Based Medicine is considered generally reliable, has a credible editorial board, and has been cited by other reliable sources. It is also not a peer-reviewed publication with respect to WP:MEDRS. Since it often covers fringe material, parity of sources may be relevant. Article written by the site editors are considered WP:SPS and WP:BLP considerations apply.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 141#Film review by David Gorski at ScienceBasedMedicine.org of Gabriel Cousens documentary Simply Raw
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 247#sciencebasedmedicine.org
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 351#Science-Based Medicine

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Science-Based Medicine WP:SBMWP:SBM 📌		2019	2025	Science-Based Medicine is considered generally reliable, has a credible editorial board, and has been cited by other reliable sources. It is also not a peer-reviewed publication with respect to WP:MEDRS. Since it often covers fringe material, parity of sources may be relevant. Article written by the site editors are considered WP:SPS and WP:BLP considerations apply.	1