Screen Rant

Screen Rant

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is consensus that Screen Rant is a marginally reliable source. It is considered reliable for entertainment-related topics, but should not be used for controversial statements related to living persons. See also: WP:VALNET

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 266#Screen Rant

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Unclear
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 21#ScreenRant
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Screen Rant WP:SCREENRANTWP:SCREENRANT 📌		2021	2021	There is consensus that Screen Rant is a marginally reliable source. It is considered reliable for entertainment-related topics, but should not be used for controversial statements related to living persons. See also: WP:VALNET	1