 (not part of original row) | |
| other names | CSM, CS Monitor |
|---|---|
| source type | foobar (not part of original row) |
| publisher | Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row) |
| classification |  Usually reliable for typical purposes |
The Christian Science Monitor is considered generally reliable for news.
Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| The Christian Science Monitor (CSM, CS Monitor) WP:CSMONITOR 📌 |
 |
20<ref group="lower-alpha">See these discussions of The Christian Science Monitor: | 
2016 |
The Christian Science Monitor is considered generally reliable for news. | 1Â  Â  |