 (not part of original row) | |
| source type | foobar (not part of original row) |
|---|---|
| publisher | Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row) |
| classification |  Usually reliable for typical purposes |
The Conversation publishes articles from academics who are subject-matter experts. It is generally reliable for subjects in the authors' areas of expertise. Opinions published in The Conversation should be handled with WP:RSOPINION.
Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.
(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)
| Source | Status (legend) |
Discussions | Use | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| List | Last | Summary | |||
| The Conversation WP:THECONVERSATION 📌 |
 |
1 2 3 4 |
2025 |
The Conversation publishes articles from academics who are subject-matter experts. It is generally reliable for subjects in the authors' areas of expertise. Opinions published in The Conversation should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. | 1Â  Â  |