The Daily Beast

The Daily Beast

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast. Most editors consider The Daily Beast a biased or opinionated source. Some editors advise particular caution when using this source for controversial statements of fact related to living persons.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 39#The Daily Beast as a source
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 242#The Daily Beast as a source for a denial
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 281#Is The Daily Beast a reliable source
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285#The daily beast
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 331#Daily Beast Tabloid Reporting
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 397#The Daily Beast and Mediaite for extraordinary claim in a BLP

• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
The Daily Beast WP:DAILYBEASTWP:DAILYBEAST 📌		1 2 3 4 5 6	2023	There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast. Most editors consider The Daily Beast a biased or opinionated source. Some editors advise particular caution when using this source for controversial statements of fact related to living persons.	1