The Hill (newspaper)

The Hill (newspaper)
logo (not part of original row)
source typefoobar (not part of original row)
publisherFooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification Usually reliable for typical purposes

The Hill is considered generally reliable for American politics. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. The publication's contributor pieces, labeled in their bylines, receive minimal editorial oversight and should be treated as equivalent to self-published sources. Some editors have expressed concerns about the reliability of Rising, a talk show produced by The Hill.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.


Notes

References

    Original table row for comparison

    (remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

    Perennial sources
    Source Status
    (legend)
    Discussions Use
    List Last Summary
    The Hill
    WP:THEHILLWP:THEHILL 📌
    Generally reliable See these discussions of The Hill: Stale discussions

    2019

    The Hill is considered generally reliable for American politics. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with the appropriate guideline. The publication's contributor pieces, labeled in their bylines, receive minimal editorial oversight and should be treated as equivalent to self-published sources. Some editors have expressed concerns about the reliability of Rising, a talk show produced by The Hill. 1 Links Spamcheck