The Register

The Register

(not part of original row)
other names	"El Reg"
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

The Register is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles. Some editors say that The Register is biased or opinionated on topics involving Wikipedia.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 4#The Register
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 79#The Register article on physicist's resignation from the American Physical Society
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 102#The Register at Santorum (neologism)
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 194#The Register as a reliable source for quotations
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229#The Register

• WP:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard/Archive58#Do The Register and The London Telegraph (among others) meet WP:RS for quoting an individual?
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
The Register ("El Reg")		1 2 3 4 5 A	2017	The Register is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles. Some editors say that The Register is biased or opinionated on topics involving Wikipedia.	1   2