Time (magazine)

Time (magazine)

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

There is consensus that Time is generally reliable. Time's magazine blogs, including Techland, should be handled with the appropriate policy. Refer to WP:NEWSORG for guidance on op-eds, which should only be used with attribution.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 8#Christopher Hitchens, "Time" magazine and "Washington Post" as RS
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 103#TIME Techland
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#TIME magazine
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#Unresolved situation: Is Time Magazine a RS? Is IMDB a RS?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 266#Karol Markowicz writing for TIME

• Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Archive 9#Why is Time Magazine green?
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Time WP:TIMEMAGAZINEWP:TIMEMAGAZINE 📌 WP:RSPTIMEWP:RSPTIME 📌		1 2 3 4 5 A	2024	There is consensus that Time is generally reliable. Time's magazine blogs, including Techland, should be handled with the appropriate policy. Refer to WP:NEWSORG for guidance on op-eds, which should only be used with attribution.	1