VentureBeat

VentureBeat

(not part of original row)
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply

There is no consensus on the reliability of VentureBeat. Some editors expressed concern over the site's publication of churnalism and AI-generated articles, and argued against using the site to establish notability. WikiProject Video games has classified VentureBeat as generally reliable for its coverage of video games.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#VentureBeat
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 482#Reevaluating VentureBeat: Churnalism, notability and AI use
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 12#Venturebeat/Gamesbeat
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
VentureBeat WP:VENTUREBEATWP:VENTUREBEAT 📌		1 2 3 A	2025	There is no consensus on the reliability of VentureBeat. Some editors expressed concern over the site's publication of churnalism and AI-generated articles, and argued against using the site to establish notability. WikiProject Video games has classified VentureBeat as generally reliable for its coverage of video games.	1