Wired (magazine)

Wired (magazine)

(not part of original row)
other names	Wired UK
source type	foobar (not part of original row)
publisher	Fooland (state-funded media) (not part of original row)
classification	Usually reliable for typical purposes

Wired magazine is considered generally reliable for science and technology.

Prior discussions

Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.

• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#leaked documents?
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 79#Wired.com
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 103#wired.com and whosnews.usaweekend.com
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Wired 1998
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 199#Wired magazine story and insistence by editors to follow apparent misrepresentation
• WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Wired re: time travel
• Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 489#WIRED admitting to publishing stories without fact checking them, knowingly doesn't publish a retraction until outed months after the fact

• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 4#Wired
• Simple summary of prior discussions: TBD

Notes

References

Original table row for comparison

(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)

Perennial sources

Source	Status (legend)	Discussions			Use
		List	Last	Summary
Wired (Wired UK)		1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A	2025	Wired magazine is considered generally reliable for science and technology.	1   2