{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gu
| last = 2022
| domain1 = acclaimedmusic.net
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Acclaimed Music}}
== Summary ==
Acclaimed Music is considered unreliable as the site is a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] with little to no editorial oversight. It often aggregates lists published by other notable publications.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Acclaimed Music]]:}}
{{excerpt|Acclaimed Music|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== RSN ===
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 21#Acclaimedmusic.net]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 50#acclaimedmusic.net]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99#acclaimedmusic.net]]
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219#Can Acclaimed Music be used to cite individual review scores?]]
=== Other ===
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Archive 41#Reliability of acclaimedmusic.net]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}
=== RfCs ===
''No RfCs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Acclaimed Music"
| [[Acclaimed Music]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 21#Acclaimedmusic.net|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 50#acclaimedmusic.net|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99#acclaimedmusic.net|3]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219#Can Acclaimed Music be used to cite individual review scores?|4]]
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Archive 41#Reliability of acclaimedmusic.net|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022|stale=n}}
| Acclaimed Music is considered unreliable as the site is a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] with little to no editorial oversight. It often aggregates lists published by other notable publications.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|acclaimedmusic.net}}
|}