{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2022
| domain1 = arstechnica.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Ars Technica}}
== Summary ==
''Ars Technica'' is considered generally reliable for science- and technology-related articles.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Ars Technica]]:}}
{{excerpt|Ars Technica|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== RSN ===
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Ars Technica news?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136#Ars Technica a Reliable Source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371# RS for Board Games- Board Game Quest, Ars Technica, Kotaku and TechRaptor]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2022|table=no}}
=== RfCs ===
''No RfCs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Ars Technica"
| ''[[Ars Technica]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 2#Ars Technica news?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 136#Ars Technica a Reliable Source?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371# RS for Board Games- Board Game Quest, Ars Technica, Kotaku and TechRaptor|3]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| ''Ars Technica'' is considered generally reliable for science- and technology-related articles.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|arstechnica.com|arstechnica.co.uk}}
|}