{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gu
| last = 2026
| domain1 =
| rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive #RfC: Avi Loeb|Rfc]]
| rfcdate = 2026
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Avi Loeb}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
In a 2026 RfC, there was general consensus among editors that Avi Loeb is not a reliable source, nor a subject matter expert within the meaning of [[WP:SPS]], on topics including UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy. Editors noted his frequent false claims, misuse of the peer-review process and failure to retract claims in the face of disconfirmatory evidence. A minority of editors felt that his work in these fields was usable, especially his peer-reviewed output. There was no consensus about Loeb's reliability as a source on high-redshift astrophysics and cosmology.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Avi Loeb]]:}}
{{excerpt|Avi Loeb|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2026|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
# 2026 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive #RfC: Avi Loeb|Rfc]]
# 1 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 496#Avi Loeb / The Age of Disclosure|Rfc]]
# 2 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 497#Is Avi Loeb a citable PRIMARY as an "established subject-matter expert" in any of the natural sciences?|Rfc]]
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Avi Loeb (UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy)"
| [[Avi Loeb]] (UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy)
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl||RfC: Avi Loeb|2026|rfc=y}}
|{{WP:RSPLAST|2026}}
| In a 2026 RfC, there was general consensus among editors that Avi Loeb is not a reliable source, nor a subject matter expert within the meaning of [[WP:SPS]], on topics including UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy. Editors noted his frequent false claims, misuse of the peer-review process and failure to retract claims in the face of disconfirmatory evidence. A minority of editors felt that his work in these fields was usable, especially his peer-reviewed output. There was no consensus about Loeb's reliability as a source on high-redshift astrophysics and cosmology.
|}