{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}} {{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}} {{Infobox source reliability | type = website | shortcut = | status = gu | last = 2026 | domain1 = | rfc = [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive #RfC: Avi Loeb|Rfc]] | rfcdate = 2026 }} {{WP:RSPIntro|Avi Loeb}} __TOC__ == Summary == In a 2026 RfC, there was general consensus among editors that Avi Loeb is not a reliable source, nor a subject matter expert within the meaning of [[WP:SPS]], on topics including UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy. Editors noted his frequent false claims, misuse of the peer-review process and failure to retract claims in the face of disconfirmatory evidence. A minority of editors felt that his work in these fields was usable, especially his peer-reviewed output. There was no consensus about Loeb's reliability as a source on high-redshift astrophysics and cosmology. == Excerpt == {{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Avi Loeb]]:}}
{{excerpt|Avi Loeb|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}} === Links === === Recency === {{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2026|table=no}} === Rfcs ===
# 2026 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive #RfC: Avi Loeb|Rfc]] # 1 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 496#Avi Loeb / The Age of Disclosure|Rfc]] # 2 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 497#Is Avi Loeb a citable PRIMARY as an "established subject-matter expert" in any of the natural sciences?|Rfc]] ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-gu" id="Avi Loeb (UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy)" | [[Avi Loeb]] (UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy) | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}} | {{rsnl||RfC: Avi Loeb|2026|rfc=y}} |{{WP:RSPLAST|2026}} | In a 2026 RfC, there was general consensus among editors that Avi Loeb is not a reliable source, nor a subject matter expert within the meaning of [[WP:SPS]], on topics including UFOs, xenobiology, galactic astronomy, aeronautics, and system astronomy. Editors noted his frequent false claims, misuse of the peer-review process and failure to retract claims in the face of disconfirmatory evidence. A minority of editors felt that his work in these fields was usable, especially his peer-reviewed output. There was no consensus about Loeb's reliability as a source on high-redshift astrophysics and cosmology. |}