{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Bloomberg L.P.}}
This source has separate reliability assessments by time period or topic; each is presented in its own section below.
__TOC__
== general ==
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| title = [[Bloomberg L.P.]] (general)
| shortcut = WP:BLOOMBERG
| status = gr
| last = 2025
| domain1 = bloomberg.com
}}
=== Summary ===
Bloomberg publications, including [[Bloomberg News]] and ''[[Bloomberg Businessweek]]'', are considered generally reliable for news and business topics. ''See also: {{pslink|Bloomberg profiles}}.''
=== Discussions ===
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 151#Bloomberg on Microsoft]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226#On Bloomberg]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 270#Bloomberg]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 281#Bloomberg News / Decision not to investigate Michael Bloomberg]]
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 499#Omitting Bloomberg from India-Pak Conflicts]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2025|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this assessment.''
== Bloomberg profiles ==
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| title = [[Bloomberg L.P.]] (Bloomberg profiles)
| shortcut = WP:BLOOMBERGPROFILES
| status = nc
| last = 2018
| domain1 = bloomberg.com
}}
=== Summary ===
Bloomberg company and executive profiles are generally considered to be based on company press releases and should only be used as a source for uncontroversial information. There is consensus that these profiles should not be used to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. Some editors consider these profiles to be akin to [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. ''See also: {{pslink|Bloomberg}}.''
=== Discussions ===
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226#On Bloomberg]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 237#User submitted Executive Profiles on Bloomberg.com]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2018|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this assessment.''
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Bloomberg L.P.]]:}}
{{excerpt|Bloomberg L.P.|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table rows for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Bloomberg"
| [[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]] ([[Bloomberg News]], ''[[Bloomberg Businessweek]]'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:BLOOMBERG}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 151#Bloomberg on Microsoft|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226#On Bloomberg|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 270#Bloomberg|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 281#Bloomberg News / Decision not to investigate Michael Bloomberg|4]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 499#Omitting Bloomberg from India-Pak Conflicts|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| Bloomberg publications, including [[Bloomberg News]] and ''[[Bloomberg Businessweek]]'', are considered generally reliable for news and business topics. ''See also: {{pslink|Bloomberg profiles}}.''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|bloomberg.com|businessweek.com}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Bloomberg profiles"
| [[Bloomberg L.P.|Bloomberg]] profiles {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:BLOOMBERGPROFILES}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 226#On Bloomberg|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 237#User submitted Executive Profiles on Bloomberg.com|2]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}}
| Bloomberg company and executive profiles are generally considered to be based on company press releases and should only be used as a source for uncontroversial information. There is consensus that these profiles should not be used to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. Some editors consider these profiles to be akin to [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. ''See also: {{pslink|Bloomberg}}.''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|bloomberg.com}}
|}