<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= 
 | status		= gu
 | last			= 2024
 | domain1		= 

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 497#RfC: Business Insider after switching to Artificial Intelligence|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2025

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Business Insider}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
Consistent with several recent decisions our community has made about LLM-generated writing, consensus here is that Wikipedians don't trust it at all. Business Insider claims that humans will review the LLM-generated content, but Wikipedians are remarkably cynical about this. Consensus is that anything published with a disclosure about "Business Insider AI" is (a) generally unreliable and (b) not an indicator of notability at AFD.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Business Insider]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Business Insider|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===


=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2024|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2025 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 497#RfC: Business Insider after switching to Artificial Intelligence|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Business Insider AI content"
| ''Business Insider'' (AI content)
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|497|RfC: Business Insider after switching to Artificial Intelligence|2025|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| Consistent with several recent decisions our community has made about LLM-generated writing, consensus here is that Wikipedians don't trust it at all. Business Insider claims that humans will review the LLM-generated content, but Wikipedians are remarkably cynical about this. Consensus is that anything published with a disclosure about "Business Insider AI" is (a) generally unreliable and (b) not an indicator of notability at AFD.
|}