<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:CESNUR
 | status		= gu
 | last			= 2026
 | domain1		= cesnur.org

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 378#RFC: Bitter Winter|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2022

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|CESNUR}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
CESNUR is an [[apologia]] site for new religious movements, and thus is inherently unreliable in its core area due to [[WP:COI|conflicts of interest]]. There is also consensus that its content is unreliable on its own merits. CESNUR has an online magazine, ''Bitter Winter'', that is also considered generally unreliable.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[CESNUR]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|CESNUR|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#CESNUR / Its proponents]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#CESNUR as a source for articles on New religious movements]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#Massimo Introvigne and CESNUR]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 504#Revisiting CESNUR as reliable source]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2026|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2022 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 378#RFC: Bitter Winter|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="CESNUR"
| [[CESNUR]] <small>(Centro Studi sulle Nuove Religioni, Center for Studies on New Religions, ''Bitter Winter'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:CESNUR}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|378|RFC: Bitter Winter|2022|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2026|stale=n}}
| CESNUR is an [[apologia]] site for new religious movements, and thus is inherently unreliable in its core area due to [[WP:COI|conflicts of interest]]. There is also consensus that its content is unreliable on its own merits. CESNUR has an online magazine, ''Bitter Winter'', that is also considered generally unreliable.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|cesnur.org|cesnur.net|bitterwinter.org}}
|}