{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = nc
| last = 2015
| domain1 = cato.org
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Cato Institute}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
The Cato Institute is considered generally reliable for its opinion. Some editors consider the Cato Institute an authoritative source on [[libertarianism in the United States]]. There is no consensus on whether it is generally reliable on other topics. Most editors consider the Cato Institute [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], so its uses should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Cato Institute]]:}}
{{excerpt|Cato Institute|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 76#Cato publications on Rand's centrality to Libertarianism]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 197#Cato Institute as a reliable source for BLPs]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2015|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Cato Institute"
| [[Cato Institute]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 76#Cato publications on Rand's centrality to Libertarianism|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 197#Cato Institute as a reliable source for BLPs|2]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2015}}
| The Cato Institute is considered generally reliable for its opinion. Some editors consider the Cato Institute an authoritative source on [[libertarianism in the United States]]. There is no consensus on whether it is generally reliable on other topics. Most editors consider the Cato Institute [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], so its uses should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|cato.org}}
|}