<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gu|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= WP:CONSORTIUMNEWS
 | status		= gu
 | last			= 2019
 | domain1		= consortiumnews.com

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Consortiumnews}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is consensus that ''Consortium News'' is generally unreliable. Certain articles (particularly those by [[Robert Parry (journalist)|Robert Parry]]) may be considered [[WP:SPS|self-published]], as it is unclear if any independent editorial review occurred. The outlet is known to lean towards uncritically repeating claims that are [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]], demonstrably false, or have been described by mainstream outlets as "conspiracy theories."

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Consortiumnews]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Consortiumnews|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 159#"Consortium News" at October Surprise conspiracy theory]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 156#Robert Parry]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 174#Robert Parry again]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 217#Is consortiumnews.com a reliable source at article 2016 United States election interference by Russia ?]]

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 272#Are meforum.org , consortiumnews.com, and theguardian.com/commentisfree RSs?]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2019|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
</div>
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Consortium News"
| [[Consortiumnews|''Consortium News'']] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:CONSORTIUMNEWS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 159#"Consortium News" at October Surprise conspiracy theory|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 156#Robert Parry|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 174#Robert Parry again|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 217#Is consortiumnews.com a reliable source at article 2016 United States election interference by Russia ?|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 272#Are meforum.org , consortiumnews.com, and theguardian.com/commentisfree RSs?|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019|stale=n}}
| There is consensus that ''Consortium News'' is generally unreliable. Certain articles (particularly those by [[Robert Parry (journalist)|Robert Parry]]) may be considered [[WP:SPS|self-published]], as it is unclear if any independent editorial review occurred. The outlet is known to lean towards uncritically repeating claims that are [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]], demonstrably false, or have been described by mainstream outlets as "conspiracy theories."
| {{WP:RSPUSES|consortiumnews.com}}
|}