{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|gr|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2012
| domain1 = engadget.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Engadget}}
__TOC__
== Summary ==
Engadget is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles. Its statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Engadget]]:}}
{{excerpt|Engadget|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== Links ===
==== RSN ====
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#TechCrunch and Engadget]]
==== Other ====
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 5#Engadget]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2012|table=no}}
=== Rfcs ===
''No Rfcs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Engadget"
| [[Engadget]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#TechCrunch and Engadget|1]]
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 5#Engadget|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2012}}
| Engadget is considered generally reliable for technology-related articles. Its statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|engadget.com}}
|}