{{Infobox source reliability
| type = website
| shortcut =
| status = gr
| last = 2018
| domain1 = ew.com
}}
{{WP:RSPIntro|Entertainment Weekly}}
== Summary ==
''Entertainment Weekly'' is considered generally reliable for entertainment-related articles. There is no consensus on whether it is reliable for other topics.
== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Entertainment Weekly]]:}}
{{excerpt|Entertainment Weekly|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
=== RSN ===
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 66#Allmovie]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#Celebrity sources and distinguishing tabloid (newspaper format) from tabloid journalism]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246#Entertainment Weekly and David Duke]]
=== Other ===
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 5#Entertainment Weekly]]
=== Recency ===
{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2018|table=no}}
=== RfCs ===
''No RfCs for this source.''
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Entertainment Weekly"
| ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' (''EW'')
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 66#Allmovie|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#Celebrity sources and distinguishing tabloid (newspaper format) from tabloid journalism|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246#Entertainment Weekly and David Duke|3]]
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 5#Entertainment Weekly|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}}
| ''Entertainment Weekly'' is considered generally reliable for entertainment-related articles. There is no consensus on whether it is reliable for other topics.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|ew.com}}
|}