<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />
{{WP:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/Header}}
{{WP:RSPNutshell|nc|shortcut=}}
{{Infobox source reliability
 | type			= website
 | shortcut		= 
 | status		= nc
 | last			= 2021
 | domain1		= entrepreneur.com

 | rfc			= [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 314#RFC: Reliability of Entrepreneur (magazine)|Rfc]]
 | rfcdate		= 2020

}}

{{WP:RSPIntro|Entrepreneur (magazine)}}
__TOC__

== Summary ==
There is no consensus for the reliability of ''Entrepreneur Magazine'', although there is a consensus that "contributor" pieces in the publication should be treated as [[WP:SPS|self-published]], similar to {{pslink|Forbes.com contributors}}. Editors did not provide much evidence of fabrication in their articles, but were concerned that its coverage tends toward [[churnalism]] and may include improperly disclosed paid pieces.

== Excerpt ==
{{hatnote|Excerpt from the lead of [[Entrepreneur (magazine)]]:}}
<div class="source-excerpt">
{{excerpt|Entrepreneur (magazine)|paragraphs=1|only=paragraphs|hat=no|references=no|inline=yes}}
</div>

== Discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

=== Links ===

==== RSN ====
<div class="source-disc-list">

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 343#No Consensus on Platforms - Need Assistance]]

</div>

=== Recency ===
<span class="source-talk-last">{{WP:RSPLAST/sandbox|2021|table=no}}</span>

=== Rfcs ===
<div class="source-rfc-list">

# 2020 [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 314#RFC: Reliability of Entrepreneur (magazine)|Rfc]]

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />

== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Entrepreneur"
|''[[Entrepreneur (magazine)|Entrepreneur]]'' <small>(''Entrepreneur India'')</small>
|{{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
|{{rsnl|314|RFC: Reliability of Entrepreneur (magazine)|2020|rfc=yes}}
|{{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
|There is no consensus for the reliability of ''Entrepreneur Magazine'', although there is a consensus that "contributor" pieces in the publication should be treated as [[WP:SPS|self-published]], similar to {{pslink|Forbes.com contributors}}. Editors did not provide much evidence of fabrication in their articles, but were concerned that its coverage tends toward [[churnalism]] and may include improperly disclosed paid pieces.
|{{WP:RSPUSES|entrepreneur.com}}
|}